Social construction is a broad concept that can be defined
many different ways and related to a variety of subjects. Ross Haenfler’s
article discusses social deviance and how it is portrayed. In relating that to
social constructionists theories he states, “social constructionist theories
treat deviance as subjective rather than objective.” He explains this to mean
that deviance is not automatically understood, but it is constructed and is
subject to change (Haenfler). This is one explanation of social construction,
but it is varied throughout different texts.
Judith
Lorber writes about social construction in relation to gender in her article Night to His Day. She states, “Most
people find it hard to believe that gender is constantly created and re-created
out of human interaction, out of social life, and is the texture and order of
that social life.” In other words, the social construction of what is normal
can change, which is a concept that is typically unfamiliar. She also states,
“These odd or deviant or third genders show us what we ordinarily take for
granted – that people have to learn to be women and men...” It has been
socially constructed that females are raised as females and males are raised as
males and that is it, but people are beginning to learn that this can change
throughout life. In other words, this social construction may be beginning to
change.
In the TED
Talk, “Understanding the Complexities of Gender” by Sam Killermann, he speaks
about gender and sexuality and how they are two separate ideas. He begins by
explaining how the gender construction began, in school, separating groups of
boys and girls and enforcing what each group should be interested in. He
describes the absurdity of this by stating, “7 billion individual identities, simplified
into two,” and, “gender isn’t really that simple, it’s true, in fact there are
as many version of gender as there are number of you.” People have typically
viewed gender as the physical parts that you were born with, so this has been
the social construction of what gender is. Throughout these different texts, we
can see that this is beginning to change.
Each of
these texts has something in common; that social construction is subject to
change. Whether they are talking about deviance or gender and sexuality, they
all can be created and re-created, and learned throughout social life. I
completely agree with this because I have seen these changes. While reading the
texts, I was really interesting in Lorber’s article and Killermann’s TED Talk,
because I can relate to them. I have lived with two gay roommates for almost
two years now and have been influenced by many different situations that I had
never experienced before. They are friends with a few individuals who were born
male, but identify as female and are making the transition. Because of the
social construction that has been put in place, this is not considered normal. I
believe that if more people started taking into consideration that social
construction is subject to change, then it wouldn’t be so different when these
changes started occurring. This would include less pressure and harm for
individuals going through those changes.
Haenfler,
Ross. "Chapter 2 Skinheads-The Symbolism of Style and Ritual." Goths,
Gamers, Grrrls. 2nd ed. 13, 14, 23-25. Print.
I really like that you brought into the conversation the TED talk. I really wanted to see it but the link wasn't working so I listened to the podcast. After reading your paragraph about the TED video it reminds me of what happened in LPS this last year with the "purple penguin" incident. I feel that LPS was doing the right thing by trying to have my inclusive language instead of creating that gender binary of boys and girls. I think it is very sad how we are conditioned from the beginning that their are only two options and you have to act the way your gender is acting or you will be looked down upon.
ReplyDeleteI also really like that you state that social construction is subject to change. Our society decides what the rules and regulations are and then when they are able to be changed. It seems to me like the people in power in a society are the ones who have the power to change the social construction. I feel that if we are ever able to take away from the "othered" idea we are going to have to tlak to the people in power in order to have those things change.
Hi Lauren!
ReplyDeleteI liked your blog post a lot, especially how you found a way to tie in all pieces of works we read/listened to. When you considered social construction as being "subject to change," I found that very insightful. You're very right in saying that, because looking back at how certain people (minorities, homosexuals) were treated even twenty years ago is completely different from how they are now! What a great point you made with that. I wasn't able to listen to the TED Talk but you make it seem very interesting, if I get a chance, I will definitely give it a listen!
I also like how you incorporated your own experiences into your post, when you said that your two roommates are gay. I bet living with them has had quite an impact on your life in the most positive way! Just from reading your post, I can see that you have a great outlook on life, good for you! Great post overall. :)
Lauren,
ReplyDeleteI think it is really interesting that you bring up the pressure and harm that people who are changing or live outside of the "norm" feel. I think regardless of people's own personal views that change should always be expected and welcomed. I think people are afraid of change because it challenges what they know, it creates a chance for uncomfortableness and for failure. There is a quote that says, with great risk comes great reward, and I think this is true. Without risking what we think to be normal and true we are keeping ourselves from great rewards and perspectives and relationships in life.